The major controversy of this revisionist BBC adaptation is not D. H. Lawrence’s naughty bits, but the lack of them. Gone are the four-letter words and personified genitals – just one half-embarrassed mention of “John Thomas” – while graphic sexual descriptions are replaced by soft-focus, coyly implicit lovemaking. Adaptor/director Jed Mercurio’s desire to avoid the TV trend of exploitative (particularly female) nudity is admirable, but by dismissing the racy passages as “smut” and grasping for an egalitarian, 21st-century reading, he’s produced a surprisingly conservative romance.
-
Recent Posts
- The Play That Goes Wrong lives up to its name: how Tier 3 closed the last big theatre show standing
- Andrew Lloyd Webber: ‘Theatres had to close, but the vaccine will make things dramatically better’
- Dull girl power speeches and wild sex do not make Bridgerton a feminist triumph
- Best dance in 2021
- Manchester theatre head: Easter warnings are ‘frightening’
Tags
Archives
Follow me on Twitter
- Raise your hand if you've been utterly emotionally destroyed by #ItsASin https://t.co/xsDHwgm5lR 14 hours ago
- Snowing in @WHampstead https://t.co/1iQamMSGtV 22 hours ago
- What can we expect from #Bridgerton series two? telegraph.co.uk/tv/0/sex-scand… #bridgertonnetflix @netflix 2 days ago
Links