Why the Jane Austen banknote matters

Mark Carney Launches New U.K. BanknoteIt’s just a picture. Right? Just a picture on a piece of paper. Can you name all the public figures who’ve been enshrined on our banknotes? Does their selection really have a major impact on contemporary gender relations? No, how can it? It’s just a picture.

Except it’s not. What the Bank of England failed to grasp, during Caroline Criado-Perez’s tireless, courageous, enormously frustrating dealings with them, is that the decision to remove the sole woman from our banknotes is a powerful symbol – the cliché that a picture is worth a thousand words is stunningly apt here. This one picture that tells young girls their aspiration and achievement will be encouraged and recognised, that women have the right to claim equal visibility with men, and that our opinion matters. The removal of that symbol is devastating.

Read my full Huffington Post blog here

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Journalism, Theatre and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Why the Jane Austen banknote matters

  1. peter swain says:

    Great piece!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s